THIS IS IMPORTANT: HEALTH CARE FIGHT MAY HINGE ON AFL-CIO CONVENTION

Do you want to know “who” is controlling the direction the health care debate is heading? Here’s a hint: It’s not Barack Obama, Harry Reid, or even Nacy Pelosi.

If you guessed that the unions are the ones controlling the debate, you would have guessed right.

From Workday Minnesota comes this interesting piece indicating who is controlling the current healthcare debate.

With one month to go before September’s national AFL-CIO Convention in Pittsburgh, the biggest floor fight there may be over health care. And that floor fight, in turn, could affect the whole health care battle on Capitol Hill and nationally.

That’s because while the federation has supported and actively campaigned for legislation based on the principles of universality, cost controls, choosing your own doctor and a government-run alternative to the insurance companies, 552 labor bodies — from international unions down to local councils — want to go in a different direction: A government-run single-payer Medicare-like system.

So if the AFL-CIO yanks its support for legislation being considered in Congress, and backed by Democratic President Barack Obama, that legislation could sink.

As of Aug. 10, four days before the resolutions deadline, single-payer health care coverage advocates had sent 40 draft resolutions backing the bill (HR 676, S 703) to the AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer’s office. One was from the California School Employees Association, a union that sits on the AFL-CIO Executive Council.

While dozens of union groups back single-payer, the Executive Council has not — so far. That may change, a CSEA council rep previously told Press Associates.

Backers include the Steelworkers, CSEA, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union and more than a dozen other AFL-CIO unions. Several, but not
those three, call single-payer one of several alternative roads to health care reform. Other labor bodies sending single-payer resolutions to the AFL-CIO include two central labor councils in the greater Cleveland area (the Dayton-Miami Valley AFL-CIO and the Erie-Crawford Pa., CLC), two in the Iron Range (the Duluth AFL-CIO and the Marquette County, Mich., Labor Council), the Minneapolis Regional Labor Federation, many California central labor councils and the Wisconsin and South Carolina state feds.

The resolutions are blunt, with a model version, from Troy, N.Y., blasting the health insurance companies. The Troy CLC’s resolution not only supports the single-payer bill by long-time Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., but bars the AFL-CIO from taking a fall-back stand in favor of a “public option” in a wider health care reform plan.

If passed, the single-payer resolutions would put the federation on record as trashing and abolishing the private insurers and their high co-pays, premiums and deductibles, denial of care and resulting 101,000 deaths from refusal to pay for care. [Ephasis added.]

This is noteworthy because, if the AFL-CIO goes along with the single-payer option (aka full socialized medicine), as opposed to the quasi-socialistic “public option”, with the newly-annointed (and much more vocal) AFL-CIO chief Richard Trumka at the helm, there will be much more heated rhetoric following the federation’s convention.

However, if there is no consensus (which is doubtful), then President Obama’s push to pass PelosiCare will be ran off the tracks without key union support.

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under AFL-CIO, socialized medcine

One response to “THIS IS IMPORTANT: HEALTH CARE FIGHT MAY HINGE ON AFL-CIO CONVENTION

  1. The unions sure are out-of-step with most Americans who are making it very clear that they favor retaining their ability to choose their own doctors and health care. The unions and the Democrats in Congress are going in the wrong direction to address the real health care problems. Eliminating state restrictions on health insurance offerings to increase choice, eliminating cost differentials on workers compensation medical problems compared to private problems, tort reforms, reduce restrictions on the supply of medical workers, and eliminating the need of private insurers to subsidize Medicare and Medicaid would be the direction to go in, if the real purpose of legislation were to address the real problems.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s